
The interesting part (I think) is how Google comes up with these personalized advertisements. By going to www.google.com/ads/preferences on your laptop or home computer, you can see a list of categories that Google has associated with you based on what websites you have visited recently. There is also a customization feature so that you can add or remove categories to better tailor the ads you receive to your interests. In an example on the Ads Preferences website, Google claims that, "throughout this process, Google does not know "Mary"'s name or any other personal information about her. Google simply recognizes the number stored in "Mary"'s browser, and shows ads related to the interest and inferred demographic categories associated with her cookie." But when you think about all the websites that people visit (social networking sites, personal blogs, bank and credit card websites, etc), it seems unrealistic that Google doesn't know your name or couldn't infer many other aspects of your identity as it "build[s] up a picture of your online habits." (Blakeman, 47).
There is the option to "Opt out" on your Ads Preferences page, meaning the ads you see will not be based on interests deduced from web activity and Google will (supposedly) stop collecting information about you.
I am certainly not anti-Google, indeed I use it on a daily, if not hourly, basis. However, I do think it's concerning for Google to market itself as a sort of digital reference librarian given the strong presence of its financial motivations throughout the Google universe. Google is unquestionably a remarkable resource, but when do we reach the point of putting too much trust in the system?
If you're interested, you can read Google's explanation of the Ads Preferences process and FAQ section at: http://www.google.com/ads/preferences/html/intl/en/about.html or Karen Blakeman's interesting short article "What Search Engines Know About You."
Blakeman, K. (2010) What Search Engines Know About You. Online (Weston, Conn.) V. 34 No. 5 (September/October): 46-48.
No comments:
Post a Comment